Why Should You Have a Twitter Avatar?

When you first register your Twitter account, you are assigned a default avatar. That is a  PNG format image with an unhatched egg  as you can see below:

So what does this image mean? Literally it is an unhatched egg. An immature bird. I assume nobody wants to give that impressions constantly :)

Now… What does that “default avatar” mean in twitterverse. If you leave your avatar as the default (and NULL) possible meanings are:

  • You do not take Twitter seriously
  • You are just lazy
  • You are a spammer
  • You are nobody
  • You are so unsocial that you cannot have a friend with a camera to take your photo
  • You are unsocial and do not have a camera
  • You are unsocial and do not know auto-shutter function of your camera
  • You are a company / group that does not have a logo
  • etc.

Best Practices for a Twitter Avatar
On Twitter (and in social networking) people would like to see yourself. Nobody likes to communicate and share things with stylistic images, cartoon characters or so.. Some ideas:

  • Put your own photo that reveals your own face (preferably professionally taken) showing how a nice person you are…

  • Use a plain background and a high quality picture. Do not let other details shadow your face…

  • You may use a a full body or a bust portrait picture, but make sure that it shows “who” you are.

  • You can also have a stylistic representation of yourself (if you are a designer or have a designer to draw one for you), you can use it as soon as it really represents you uniquely.

  • Avoid webcam shots.. They are low quality and blurred.

So, what if you are not a single person. Some ideas below:

  • For a couple, use a picture together

  • For a brand/company/group/team, use the logo

  • For a “robot”, use the picture of your “robot”

  • For a pet or plant, use a picture of it

Posted in social media networking | Leave a comment

Understanding Polyphonic Harmony and Temperaments

In the 12-note scale, when the basic chords (like a C major chord) are being formed, the sense of harmony is quite related with the integer #of characteristic waves that fits into longer waves (lower frequency, lower pitch).

Let’s consider the C-major (middle) chord: C4 E4 G4 C5 (do-mi-sol-do)

If the C4 is tuned to 261.63 Hz the wave length is .00382219164468906470 s. Lets calculate the frequencies of E4, G4 and C5. Initially note that two times the frequency (half the wavelength) is one octave higher in the scale (or half the frequency is one octave below).

A piano sound sample for C4

If we put 2 smaller waves in a single C4 wave:
.00382219164468906470  / 2 = .00191109582234453235 s
freq = 523.26 Hz

Sample of C4 and C5 together

If we put 3 smaller in a single C4 wave
.00382219164468906470 / 3 = .00127406388156302156 s
freq = 784.89 Hz

This is one octave higher. If we lower 1 octave (freq/2) -> 392.445 Hz

Sample of chord C4-G4-C5

If we put 5 smaller waves in a single C4 wave:
.00382219164468906470 / 5 = .00076443832893781294 s
freq = 1308.15 Hz
That is 2 octave higher. If we lower 2 octaves (freq/(2^2)) -> 327.0375 Hz

Sample of chord C4-E4-G4-C5

The above wave snippet shows only a timeframe of 15 milliseconds (0.0015 seconds). The human ear / mind cannot process this tiny wave separately and the hearing mechanism unconsciously perceives the wave alignment as “harmony” :) ..

The contemporary frequencies for western music we have the following on a standard piano keyboard:

  • C4 261.63 Hz
  • E4 329.63 Hz
  • G4 392.00 Hz
  • C5 523.25 Hz

But the resulting frequencies are slightly different:

  • C4 261.63 Hz
  • E4 327.0375 Hz (-0.79% error)
  • G4 392.445 Hz (0.11% error)
  • C5 523.26 Hz (0.002% error)

This does not look perfect. Right? But well nothing is perfect .. See below:

Explanation of the Error Percentages

We should note that the errors below 1% are not noticeable to untrained ears at all where they are hardly noticeable to well-trained ears.

This basic mechanism is an implementation of the Pythagorean tuning which was a system of just (and mathematically perfect) intonation which tuned every note in a scale from a progression of pure perfect fifths (ratio of 3:2).

This was quite suitable for much of the harmonic practice until then, but in the Renaissance, musicians wished to make much more use of Tertian (C4-E(flat)4) harmony. The major third of Pythagorean tuning differed from a just major third by an amount known as Syntonic comma, which musicians of the time found annoyingly impure.

Syntonic Comma

In music theory, the syntonic comma, is a small interval between two musical notes, equal to the frequency ratio 81:80. Two notes that differ by this interval would sound different from each other even to untrained ears, but would be close enough that they would be more likely interpreted as out-of-tune versions of the same note than as different notes. That stands as an error of 1.25% this is generally not noticeable.

Through Baroque, Renaissance era and 19th century there had been various temperaments used for the scales but today western music is based on the irregular temperament called Well Temperament.

Western Music Today – Well Temperament

“Well tempered” means that the twelve notes per octave of the standard keyboard are tuned in such a way that it is possible to play music in most major or minor keys and it will not sound perceptibly out of tune.

Summary

The C-major chord with contemporary (well) temperament:

  • C4 261.63 Hz
  • E4 329.63 Hz
  • G4 392.00 Hz
  • C5 523.25 Hz

is an acceptable approximation of mathematically perfect frequencies of 261.63, 327.0375, 392.445, 523.26 Hz chord with Pythagorean tuning.

Some text are copies from references below:

 

 

Posted in music, science | Leave a comment